The Thinking Minority

I now crown Jelani the King of Long Posts.

I think, though, that common law and insurance must have differing definitions of attractive nuisance. In this case, according to insurance rules, attractive nuisance means that the dog is enticing (as are trampolines and swimming pools) and so the owner is liable for any damage he causes, even if the child trespasses to get to the dog/trampoline/swimming pool. Any way you look at it, the owner is liable. Bad owner, bad.