Wednesday, April 28, 2004
Ok, and I know this is picky, but - if they say that it was worth it to remove Saddam, doesn't that technically imply that the war did more good than harm? How can you say that something did more harm than good, but was worth it? Isn't something only worth it if it did more good than harm? hm?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment